Pharaoh = tax the dead.

   A man wanted to impress the king of Egypt. Hires goones to guard burial grounds, made them pay to bury their dead. They complain to pharaoh never has this been done since Adam & Eve. Kings tax but to tax the dead dying families to bury them, we can't take such a heavy payment. 

The king of Egypt is pissed. Summons the man, and he comes with his entourage, women, slaves, gifts, and the king is so impressed he calls him pharaoh for he even makes money from the dead, taxing even the dead to bury themselves. 

Thus he became so great that pharaoh took the kingship usurping king line in Egypt, and thus from then on in Egypt where they tax even the dead to bury themselves or just for dying they have no king but pharaoh. 

 

       This is EXACTLY WHAT Thomas Jefferson has hit 🎯 upon.

 

T.j. "world belongs to the living in it."

 

  So they may give it to his creditor. But the child, the legatee, or creditor takes it, not by any natural right, but by a law of the society of which they are members, & to which they are subject.

      (The 50% death tax in U.S.A. is outrageous, mainly to stop the middle poor class from passing down wealth).

 

        Then no man can, by natural right, oblige the lands he occupied, or the persons who succeed him in that occupation, to the paiment of debts contracted by him. 

       (The deficit is said to be owed by the people, when the predecessors who racked up this debt overstepped their bounds. In the same way they say we are to pay, we are to say no we will not. Or we are less than the dead, who made our choice for us. So then if they rack up bills to leave the living when dead, then shall we do the same, & how do we make that call for them? How then do the living make any call, all in debt by the predecessors who cares not for the living. Then should the living care for the idols enslaving them set by the dead. No that would be ridiculous. Perposterous. I am not the son of the engineer & if I was would I not rule the engine and not the engine me. But of course). 

 

       For if he could, he might, during his own life, eat up the usufruct of the lands for several generations to come, & then the lands would belong to the dead, & not to the living, which would be the reverse of our principle. 

---( thus then in the same manor in which the dead made their decision living, we living make our decision as living or make the living dead serving the dead, who care not for anything they are dead. Thus it is PAY-AGAIN PAGAN fair owe the rich PHARAOH). 

 

       What is true of every member of the society individually, is true of them all collectively, since the rights of the whole can be no more than the sum of the rights of the individuals.

         (Then it is, either u are all together free from PAY-AGAIN PAGAN IDOLS as individuals or you are as the sum slaves to PAY-AGAIN PAGAN IDOLS. then it is as the Bible says, "choose you this day whom you shall serve." AKA "peace purchased at the price of chains & slavery forbid it all MIGHTY GOD.").

 

       To keep our ideas clear when applying them to a multitude, let us suppose a whole generation of men to be born on the same day, to attain mature age on the same day, & to die on the same day, leaving a succeeding generation in the moment of attaining their mature age all together.

 

 

Again suppose Louis XV. & his cotemporary generation had said to the money-lenders of Genoa, give us money that we may eat, drink, & be merry in our day; and on condition you will demand no interest till the end of 19.5 years you shall then for ever after receive an annual interest of *12⅝ per cent.6 The money is lent on these conditions, is divided among the living, eaten, drank, & squandered. Would the present generation be obliged to apply the produce of the earth & of their labour to replace their dissipations? Not at all.

 

I suppose that the recieved opinion, that the public debts of one generation devolve on the next, has been suggested by our seeing habitually in private life that he who succeeds to lands is required to pay the debts of his ancestor or testator: without considering that this requisition is municipal only, not moral; flowing from the will of the society, which has found it convenient to appropriate lands, become vacant by the death of their occupant, on the condition of a paiment of his debts: but that between society & society, or generation & generation, there is no municipal obligation, no umpire but the law of nature. We seem not to have percieved that, by the law of nature, one generation is to another as one independant nation to another.7

     (Thus they seek to take the whole of dominion by making court rooms their gods of God's of God's, thus binding one generation to the other in municipal rule as though like to gods. They decreeing all things by decree of the most important, the husband & wife. By doing this they can the decree dominions thus can decree what you choose & u pursuit and all this is idol gods deciding good & evil to you, and if you don't obey the idol then no good but only evil befalls you. For u have stepped out of their new dominion they seek to have for generations and generation. By municipal idol legal claim. USURPING all given by GOD in truth of nature and honor & authority.